The MDM Paradox: Why Device Management Doesn't Solve Asset Management

Download our free whitepaper to learn why IT teams invested in mobile device management (MDM) tools, yet still can't answer "Where are our devices?" - and what to do about it.

What's Covered In This Whitepaper

The new reality of hardware asset management

How remote and hybrid work has fundamentally changed the challenge of tracking hardware. 40% of IT leaders surveyed manage fully remote workforces, and another 40% operate in hybrid environments - making legacy asset tracking approaches obsolete.

The MDM paradox explained

Why MDM tools like Intune, Jamf, and Iru - despite being excellent at security and configuration - leave six critical gaps in hardware asset management, from physical location tracking to warranty and lifecycle data.

The offboarding black hole

Real stories from IT Directors about unrecovered devices, six-month equipment chases, and international recovery nightmares - costing organizations anywhere from a few thousand to $50,000+ annually.

The lifecycle management blindspot

How reactive lifecycle management leads to surprise replacements, wasted discovery time during migrations, and difficult budget conversations with finance teams.

What IT leaders actually want

Six consistent themes from IT Directors on what's missing - from a single source of truth and automated lifecycle planning to real-time device intelligence and cross-border support.

The path forward

What high-performing IT organizations do differently, plus three concrete actions any IT leader can take to close the gap between device management and asset management.

Key Findings

1. MDM doesn't equal asset management

87% of organizations use device management platforms, yet many still can't produce a complete hardware inventory. MDM manages software, security, and configuration on enrolled devices. It doesn't track physical location, peripherals, user assignment during transitions, warranty status, or device recovery during offboarding.

2. Offboarding is the most expensive gap

IT leaders reported losing thousands to $50,000+ annually in unrecovered hardware. Remote work eliminated the simple "return it on your last day" model, and relying on employee compliance to ship equipment back fails often enough to be costly.

3. Lifecycle management is reactive, not strategic

IT teams discover end-of-life devices during migrations rather than planning proactively. One team spent more time on discovery than actual upgrade work during a Windows 10 to 11 migration because they didn't have accurate inventory data.

4. IT leaders want integration, not replacement

No one wants to rip out their MDM. They want a system that works alongside Intune, Jamf, or Iru to provide the asset management layer those tools don't offer - unified visibility, automated workflows, and lifecycle planning.

Who This Whitepaper Is For

IT Directors and Managers

You've deployed a MDM but still rely on spreadsheets to track hardware. You know there are gaps, and you need the data to make the case for a better approach.

IT Asset Managers

You're responsible for hardware visibility, lifecycle planning, and audit readiness. This report gives you aframework for evaluating where your current process breaks down.

CIOs and IT VPs

You need to understand the financial risk of poor asset visibility, from unrecovered hardware costs to unplanned capital expenditure from surprise replacements, and what it takes to fix it.

Finance and Operations Leaders

You want predictable hardware budgets and clean asset records for depreciation and financial reporting. This
report explains why that's harder than it sounds and what your IT team needs to deliver it.

Why We Wrote This Whitepaper

At BlueTally, we build IT asset management software for distributed teams. We talk to IT leaders every day who have the same frustration: they've invested in enterprise-grade MDM tools, but still can't answer basic questions about their hardware.

This report documents that gap - not to sell you on replacing your MDM, but to help you understand why device management and asset management are fundamentally different problems, and what it takes to solve both.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the MDM paradox?

Exit FAQ Icon | BlueTally
The MDM paradox is the disconnect between having enterprise-grade device management tools deployed and still lacking basic hardware asset visibility. MDM tools manage software, security, and configuration - but they don't track physical asset location, peripherals, warranty status, or device recovery during offboarding.

Who was interviewed for this whitepaper?

Exit FAQ Icon | BlueTally
The whitepaper is based on conversations with 15 IT Directors at companies with 50 to 1,000 employees across manufacturing, SaaS, financial services, IT services, and professional services. Companies ranged from fully on-site to fully distributed workforces.

Is this whitepaper relevant if I don't use Microsoft Intune or Jamf?

Exit FAQ Icon | BlueTally
Yes. The MDM paradox applies to any device management platform, including Iru, Addigy, and others. The gap between device management and asset management exists regardless of which MDM you use.

What's the difference between device management and asset management?

Exit FAQ Icon | BlueTally
Device management (MDM) handles software deployment, security policies, and configuration for enrolled devices. Asset management tracks the full lifecycle of physical hardware - who has it, where it is, when its warranty expires, and what happens to it when an employee leaves. They solve different problems and work best together.

How much does poor asset management actually cost?

Exit FAQ Icon | BlueTally
IT leaders in the whitepaper cited losses from a few thousand to $50,000+ annually in unrecovered hardware alone. Additional costs include time spent manually tracking assets, duplicate purchases, warranty-expired repairs, and audit readiness failures.

Does fixing this mean replacing my MDM?

Exit FAQ Icon | BlueTally
No. The whitepaper's key finding is that IT leaders want integration, not replacement. The solution is adding a dedicated asset management layer that works alongside your existing MDM investment.